SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clarivate Analytics
PubMed
Embase


European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry  —  Vol. 33, Issue 4 (December 2025) ← Back to issue
📄 PDF

Knowledge and Practice of Endocrown Application Among Dentists in Saudi Arabia

DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_2865Khudhairy16
Keywords

Endocrown; postendodontic restoration; knowledge; clinical practice; dentists; Saudi Arabia; questionnaire survey; CAD/CAM; adhesive cementation.

Authors

May W. Al- Khudhairy1
Mahesh Suganna2
*

Shaista Haleem3
Ghousia Sayeed4
Mariyah Mohammed Almasrahi5
Ghala Abdulrahman Al Dhurman6

Address for Correspondence

Dr. Mahesh Suganna
Email: mahesh.golgeri@riyadh.edu.sa

B D.S, DMSc, Associate Professor, Department of
Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh Elm
University, Associate Professor and Consultant in Oral
Biology
Diplomate of American Board of Orofacial Pain
Fellow of American Academy of Orofacial Pain Email:
may.alkhudhairy@riyadh.edu.sa https://orcid.
org/0000000304983318
2*B
.D.S, M.D.S, FPFA, FDSD, FOI(Sweden), Basal
Implantologist Assistant Professor, Department
of Prosthodontics, College of Medicine and
Dentistry, Riyadh Elm University, Riyadh Elm
University, Riyadh- Kingdom Saudi Arabia. Email:
mahesh.golgeri@riyadh.edu.sa https://orcid.
org/0009000927894036 3BDS, MSc Aesthetic and
Restorative Dentistry, Lecturer, Department of Applied
Medical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, Nursing and
Medical Sciences, Riyadh Elm University, RiyadhKingdom Saudi Arabia. Email: shaista.haleem@riyadh.
edu.sa https://orcid.org/0009000433567684
4
B.D.S, M.D.S, PGCME(UK), PhD Assistant Professor, Preventive Dentistry Department, DH Program Director, College of Medicine and Dentistry, Riyadh
Elm University, Riyadh- Kingdom Saudi Arabia.
Email: dr_ghousia@riyadh.edu.sa / docghousia@gmail.
com https://orcid.org /000900021281926X
5
Intern, Department of Dental Assistant, College of
Applied Medical Sciences, Riyadh Elm
University, Riyadh- Kingdom Saudi Arabia.Email:
maryah.m.majed2021@ student.riyadh.edu.sa https://
orcid.org/0009000122283780
6
Intern, Department of Dental Assistant, College of
Applied Medical Sciences, Riyadh Elm
University, Riyadh- Kingdom Saudi Arabia.Email: ghala.a.aldurman2021@student.riyadh .edu.sa https://
orcid.org/0009000414068038
Received: 18.10. 2025
Accepted: 12.12. 2025

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2025) 33, 447-455

Knowledge and Practice of Endocrown Application Among
Dentists in Saudi Arabia

ABSTRACT

Background: Among the different restorative options, the endocrown has emerged as

an adhesive and minimally invasive alternative for restoring endodontically treated posterior teeth. However, how well these principles were understood and translated into routine practice among dentists in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia had not been consistently quantified. Methods: In this study, a crosssectional, online questionnaire survey was carried out among licensed dentists practicing in Saudi Arabia. Data collection pertained to sociodemographics, knowledge related to endocrowns, and selfreported practice patterns. Results: A total of 400 dentists participated. At least one endocrown cemented, representing endocrown adoption, equated to 94.5% (378/400). Adoption significantly varied with clinical experience, including 88.9% (144/162) among dentists with ≤5 years, 98.2% (223/227) among those with 6–10 years, and 100.0% (11/11) among those with >10 years (χ²=16.56, df=2, p<0.001). By experience, the intensity of endocrown use also varied (χ²=51.86, df=6, p<0.001), with 61.5% (240/390) reporting 6–10 endocrowns cemented in the past year, followed by <5 (30.0%, 117/390), >10 (3.1%, 12/390), and none (5.4%, 21/390). Conclusion: The adoption rate of the endocrown among the surveyed dentists in Saudi Arabia was high; however, its adoption and annual use intensity varied with clinical experience and knowledge, the latter remaining an independent predictor after adjustment.

INTRODUCTION

Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth remains a central challenge in contemporary restorative dentistry due to frequent extensive loss of coronal tissue from caries, previous restorations, access cavity preparation, and endodontic procedures. This tissue depletion results in reductions in stiffness and altered stress distribution under occlusal loading [1]. In this context, endocrowns have gained popularity as a conservative, adhesive alternative to conventional post–core–crown workflows for severely compromised molars and premolars, especially when radicular preparation is undesirable or unnecessary and when modern adhesive protocols and CAD/CAM fabrication are available. Recent questionnairebased studies conducted in the Saudi Arabia context have reported variable levels of awareness, conceptual understanding, and perceived indications for endocrowns among dentists and trainees, reflecting ongoing diffusion of the technique with heterogeneity across practitioner groups and settings [2–4]. Conceptually, the endocrown is envisaged as a monolithic indirect restoration that derives retention and resistance through a combination of intracoronal extension within the pulp chamber and adhesive bonding to enamel and dentin, by this means minimizing or avoiding post space preparation and conserving radicular dentin [5]. The related biomechanical concept considers a “monoblocklike” restoration–tooth complex in which functional loads are dissipated through a broad cervical buttjoint margin and internal walls, potentially simplifying the procedure without compromises regarding the iatrogenic risks of post placement [67]. However, the clinical outcome of an endocrown relies on several interconnected variables, such as the amount and quality of the remaining tooth structure, the geometry and depth of the pulp chamber, cervical margin design, occlusal concept, and the chosen restorative material and bonding approach [8]. Observational studies conducted in the Saudi environment emphasized that awareness of these determinants and confidence in adhesive procedures are not uniform and might therefore lead some clinicians to underindicate endocrowns where they would be the material of choice or to apply them in incomplete accordance with established principles of preparation and cementation [1, 9]. ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

EJPRD

Article Information
Pages
447 – 455
Cover Date
December 2025
Volume
33
Issue
4
Print ISSN
0965-7452
Electronic ISSN
2396-8893