SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clarivate Analytics
PubMed
Embase


European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry  —  Vol. 34, Issue 1 (January 2026) ← Back to issue
📄 PDF

Comparative Analysis of Post-Endodontic Restoration Designs on Fracture Resistance in Endodontically Treated Premolars

DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_2865Karni30
Keywords

Endodontically treated premolars, postendodontic restoration, fracture outcomes, fiber post, clinical outcomes

Authors

Dr. Prashant A Karni1*
Professor, Specialisation: Prosthodontics
and Crown & bridge, Implantology
Department of Prosthodontics and Crown &
bridge, KLE VK institute of Dental
Sciences, Kaher, Belagavi ,590010 ,India ,
Email Id: prashantkarni@yahoo.co.in
Orcid Id: 0000-0003-0195-5290

Dr. Shreya Malhotra2
Dental Practitioner, Specialisation: BDS,
Department of Dentistry,Manav Rachna
Dental College, Manav Rachna
International Institute of Research and
Studies, Faridabad,Haryana, 121010, India,
Email Id: shreyamalhotra369@gmail.com
Orcid Id: 0009-0002-9027-1009

Dr. Ena maakhni3
Senior Resident, Specialisation: General
Dentistry, Department of Dentistry, AIIMS
Gorakhpur, 273008, Gorakhpur, India,
Email ID: emaakhni@gmail.com , Orcid Id:
0009000296053889
Deesha Kumari4,
Reader, Specialisation: MDS,Department of
Public Health Dentistry, NITTE (Deemed
to be University), AB Shetty Memorial
Institute of Dental Sciences (ABSMIDS)
,Mangalore, 575018,India, Email Id:
drdeesha.k@gmail.com , Orcid Id: 00000002-9814-1105.
Vijayakumar.M5
Reader, Specialisation: Pediatric and
Preventive Dentist, Department of Pediatric
and Preventive Dentistry, Tagore Dental
College and Hospital, Rathinamangalam,
Chennai, 600127, Tamil Nadu, India, Email
Id: drvijaypedo6@gmail.com, Orcid Id:
0000-0002-9345-9261

Dr. Sumaiya Fatima6
Dentist, Specialisation:Dental Surgery,
Bachelor of Dental Surgery ,Kamineni
Institute of Medical Sciences, Narketpalle
,Hyderabad,50057, India , Email Id:
sumaiya6162@yahoo.com Orcid Id::00090000-6401-5381

Dr. Gowtham. N7
Assistant Professor, Specialisation:
Pharmacology, Department of
Pharmacology, Sree Balaji Medical College
and Hospital, Bharath Institute of Higher
Education and Research, Chromepet,
Chennai ,Tamil Nadu,600044, India, Email
Id: gowthamn11@hotmail.com , Orcid Id:
0009-0000-2359-3409
Received: 03.01.2026
Accepted: 02.02.2026

European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry (2026) 34,(1) 97–105

Comparative Analysis of PostEndodontic
Restoration
Designs
on
Fracture
Resistance in Endodontically
Treated Premolars

ABSTRACT

Endodontically treated premolars exhibit increased susceptibility to fracture due to structural compromise and altered biomechanical behavior. Selection of an appropriate post-endodontic restoration design is therefore critical for enhancing fracture outcomes and long-term clinical success. Though, comparative clinical evidence evaluating fracture outcomes across different restoration designs in premolars remains limited. This retrospective observational cohort study analyzed clinical and radiographic records of endodontically treated premolars restored with different post-endodontic restoration designs. Teeth were categorized into direct composite restorations without posts, fiber post–supported composite core restorations, cast metal post-and-core restorations, and full-coverage or endocrown restorations. Fracture incidence, mean time to fracture, and fracture occurrence were evaluated. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, correlation analysis, and binary logistic regression to assess associations and predictors of fracture outcomes. A total of 120 endodontically treated premolars were included. Fiber post–supported composite restorations demonstrated the longest mean fracture-free duration and the lowest fracture risk. Direct composite restorations without posts showed the shortest fracturefree longevity, while cast metal post-and-core restorations were associated with increased fracture risk. A significant difference in mean time to fracture was observed between post-retained and non-post-retained restorations. Correlation and regression analyses confirmed restoration design as a significant predictor of fracture occurrence. Post-endodontic restoration design significantly influences fracture outcomes in endodontically treated premolars. Fiber post– supported composite restorations provide superior fracture outcomes and clinical longevity. Restoration strategies incorporating biomechanical reinforcement should be prioritized to minimize fracture risk and improve longterm prognosis.

Keywords:INTRODUCTION

Endodontic therapy is an important part of modern restorative dentistry as it allows saving pulpal and periapical pathology-affected teeth. Even with the high success rates of the modern endodontic treatments, endodontically treated teeth prove to have a higher susceptibility to structural failure in comparison with vital teeth.1 This increased susceptibility to fracture is chiefly explained by loss of large volumes of tooth structure due to caries, access cavity preparation and restorative procedures and altered post-endodontic biomechanical properties of dentin.2,3 Long term success of endodontic treatment is closely linked to the quality and design of the endodontic restoration. Restoration design establishes the distribution of stress in the tooth-restoration complex and is vital in eliminating the risk of fractures and increasing the clinical longevity. 4 •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ejprd.org - Published by Dennis Barber Journals. Barber Ltd. All rights reserved

EJPRD

Copyright ©2025 by Dennis

Article Information
Pages
97 – 105
Cover Date
January 2026
Volume
34
Issue
1
Electronic ISSN
2396-889