Conventional Surgical tracheostomy (ST), Dilatational Percutaneous tracheostomy (DPT), critically ill patients.
AuthorsAbstractBackground: Tracheostomy is an alternate method of airway management that has the potential to alleviate patient discomfort and reduce the amount of work required to maintain the airway. Objective: to discuss the risks and outcomes associated with surgical tracheostomy (ST) and percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT). Methods: The study has employed a retrospective review of medical records. Critically sick patients undertook either ST tracheostomy or PDT. Statistical techniques were applied to analyze results and complications posttracheostomy. Results: 106 patients (PDT=66; ST=40) were surveyed. Demographics and comorbidities were similar in both groups. Length of stay in the ICU was significantly shorter in the PDT group (38.2 ± 22.4 days) in comparison to ST (56.1 ± 30.6 days) (p < 0.001). Weaning success was higher in the PDT group (68.2%) than ST (55.0%), although not statistically significant (p = 0.173). Complication rates were similar between the two groups with no statistically significant differences. Conclusions: PDT appears to be a safe and efficient alternative to ST, with a notable reduction in ICU stay and a trend toward faster weaning. however, no statistically significant differences were observed in complication rates, successful weaning, or short-term survival. Given the retrospective single-center design relatively small sample size, non-randomized patient allocation and potential confounding factors, the findings should be interpreted as exploratory and hypothesis-generating rather than definitive comparative evidence. Larger multicenter prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• ejprd.org - Published by Riset Publication Services LLC
EJPRD
Copyright ©2026 by Riset Publication Services LLC