SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clarivate Analytics
PubMed
Embase


European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry  —  Vol. 20, Issue 1 (March 2012) ← Back to issue

Evaluation of Splinting Implant Impression Techniques: Two Dimensional Analyses

DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_1025Tarib05

Abstract - This paper aims to evaluate the effect of splinting during implant impression. A master model with two fixtures at the sites of 45 and 47 was used. 20 impressions were made for all four techniques: (A) indirect; (B) direct, unsplinted; (C) direct, splinted; and (D) direct, splinted, sectioned, and re-splinted. Splinting was undertaken with autopolymerizing acrylic resin (AAR). Horizontal distance between fixtures was compared using a digital caliper. The difference in distance were analysed with one-way ANOVA. Group A showed a significantly lowest accuracy among all techniques (p≤0.05). There was no significant difference of accuracy among the groups using direct techniques (p≥0.05). Group D was more accurate compared to group B and C. We conclude that splinting of impression copings would be beneficial to obtain an accurate impression.

KEYWORDS: multiple implants impression techniques, horizontal distance, splinting techniques

Article Information
Pages
35 – 39
Cover Date
March 2012
Volume
20
Issue
1
Print ISSN
0965-7452
no access

You do not currently have access to this article.

£10.00

Or subscribe to the journal for full access to all articles.