SCImago Journal & Country Rank
Clarivate Analytics
PubMed
Embase


European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry  —  Vol. 25, Issue 2 (June 2017) ← Back to issue

Efficacy of Removable Partial Denture Treatment: A Retrospective Oral Health-Related Quality of Life Evaluation

DOI: 10.1922/EJPRD_01669Ali07

Objectives: The 3 objectives are to assess current preferences for impressions for complete dentures, audit practice and compare practice to current UK teaching. Methods: Three surveys where undertaken; a survey of GDPs preferences, an audit of practice and a survey of teaching in UK dental schools. Results: UK Universities advocate border moulded custom trays. In stated preferences, 99% of practitioners used custom trays for private practice; 67% for NHS work. In actual use, the audit found 91% practitioners in private practice used custom trays; in NHS practice 78% did so. The most widely taught materials were silicone (43%), alginate (29%), & zinc oxide eugenol paste (19%). In practitioners stated preferences, 97% of NHS and 53% of private dentists listed alginate as an option; however the audit showed only 74% (NHS) and 52% (private) actually used alginate, with 20% (NHS) and 48% (private) using silicone. Conclusions: Definitive impressions in custom trays are used by GDPs for both private and NHS work; they are universally taught at UK dental schools. Alginate is popular in NHS practice; however, silicone is more widely taught in UK Universities. The use of silicone materials for definitive impressions has increased since 1999. In UK private practice silicone usage is aligned in popularity with alginate.

Keywords

Prosthodontic Denture Impression General Dental Practice Removable Prosthesis

Article Information
Pages
101 – 107
Cover Date
June 2017
Volume
25
Issue
2
Print ISSN
0965-7452
Electronic ISSN
2396-8893
no access

You do not currently have access to this article.

£10.00

Or subscribe to the journal for full access to all articles.