European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Evaluating the Bond Strength of a Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network to Zirconia Using the Crossbeam Push-Off Method

Abstract

Porcelains and glass-ceramics have been used to produce CAD-milled veneers and crowns for zirconia copings and implant-abutments. This study evaluated the bondstrength of a polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network to zirconia using two adhesive cement systems: Panavia 21 and Multilink Automix. Lithium disilicate and feldspathic porcelain were also tested as reference CAD-On materials. Long beams (3x6x40 mm3) of zirconia and short beams (3x6x15 mm3) of the CAD-On materials were prepared. Zirconia and each CAD-On material were bonded in a crossbeam arrangement and subjected to a modified tensile bond-strength test. Half of the samples in each group (n=10) were tested 5 days after bonding (baseline) and the remaining (n=10) underwent aging (50,000 thermocycles at 5°C and 55°C) prior to bond-strength testing. The effects of material, cement, and aging on the tensile bond-strength were tested using a three-way
ANOVA. The reference lithium disilicate/Multilink system showed no significant differences in bond strength compared to polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network and porcelain. The long-term retention of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network was not statistically different compared to the baseline values and the two reference materials. With comparable bond strength between all materials, polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network is the favorable choice for CAD-On to zirconia copings and implant-abutments due to its superior resistance to fatigue fracture relative to porcelain.
Keywords
Glass-Ceramic
Feldspathic Ceramic
Zirconia
Adhesion
Resin Cement
Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic

Authors

Nadav Bashary, Marina R. Kaizer, Abeer Tashkandi, Yuwei Fan, Mutlu Özcan, Nadin Al Haj Husain, Yu Zhang

Articles from this issue

Title / DOI Access Page Start Page End Purchase
Comparison of Stud Retentor Versus Bar-Clip Attachment as ImplantSupported Systems Used in Overdentures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
10.1922/EJPRD_2338deCastro19
no access 169 187 £10.00
Evaluation of Various Polishing Systems for Lithium Disilicate Glass-Ceramics
10.1922/EJPRD_2332Lee12
no access 188 199 £10.00
The Influence of a Flexible Model on the Marginal Adaptation of Inlay Composite Restorations: A MicroCT Analysis
10.1922/EJPRD_2351Villanueva07
no access 200 206 £10.00
Evaluating the Bond Strength of a Polymer Infiltrated Ceramic Network to Zirconia Using the Crossbeam Push-Off Method
10.1922/EJPRD_2348Bashary07
no access 207 213 £10.00
Strain Gauge Analysis of the Stresses Induced by Different Secondary Coping Materials in Tooth Supported Telescopic Overdentures
10.1922/EJPRD_2361Mohamed09
no access 214 222 £10.00
Comparison of Dentin Caries Remineralization with Four Bioactive Cements
10.1922/EJPRD_2363Valizadeh07
no access 223 229 £10.00
Effect of Translucency and Curing Mode of Four CAD/CAM Materials on Polymerization Efficiency of Light and Dual Cure Resin Cements
10.1922/EJPRD_2353Shono09
no access 230 238 £10.00
Evaluation of the Efficacy of Two Fibre-Reinforced Post Removal Techniques
10.1922/EJPRD_02101AlShabib06
no access 239 244 £10.00
  • free access Free Access
  • no access No Access
  • full access Full Access

Subscriptions