European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Progressive Tooth Wear Against Resin-Based Restorative Composites

Abstract

Purpose: The composition and properties of resin-based composite materials could affect tooth wear and lead to clinical problems. Therefore, the study objective was to characterize human tooth wear behavior against a bulk-fill restorative (BF) compared to a conventional resin composite (RC) and a CAD/CAM resin nano ceramic (RN). Methods: Square-shaped specimens of each material were prepared and sub-divided according to the number of testing cycles (n=8): 100,000, 250,000, and 500,000 cycles. An occlusal wear test was performed using a chewing machine with 49 N, 2 Hz, in 37°C distilled water. Human premolar cusps were used as antagonists. Micro-CT and laser scanner were used to scan antagonists and specimens, respectively. Wear volume was assessed
using a software and the wear pattern was examined with SEM. Softening in solvent analysis was performed by measuring the materials’ Knoop microhardness (KHN) before and after immersion in ethanol. Wear volume data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Student-Neuman-Keuls test (α=0.05). Results: For tooth and specimen wear volume, there was statistical significance for material and number of cycles, but not for the interaction between factors. BF resulted in less tooth (p=0.008) and specimen (p=0.030) wear than RN and RC, which were similar (p>0.05). Volume loss increased from 100,000 to 500,000 cycles. BF showed the lowest microhardness (KHN1); and %ΔKHN similar to RC, but greater than RN. Conclusion: BF induced less volume loss to the tooth than RC
and RN, while presenting greater wear resistance. The tooth wear pattern and damage progression were mild for all materials. Clinical Significance: Resin composites show favorable wear behavior, leading to low volume loss and mild structural damage of the tooth. Regular bulk-fill resin composite stands out for its efficient restorative technique, low wear susceptibility and reduced capacity to wear down the tooth.

Keywords
Tooth Wear
Resin Composite
Dental Restoration Wear

Authors

Amanda Bettker, Audrea D. Nogueira, Evilin R. X. Marcolin, Flavia Tumelero, Fabricio M. Collares, Marcia Borba

Articles from this issue

Title / DOI Access Page Start Page End Purchase
Progressive Tooth Wear Against Resin-Based Restorative Composites
10.1922/EJPRD_2636Bettker10
no access 244 253 £
Does the Incorporation of Graphene Oxide into PMMA Influence its Antimicrobial Activity?
10.1922/EJPRD_2651Ferreira07
no access 254 260 £
Influence of Different Undercut Depths of Clasp Fabricated by Selective Laser Melting on Retentive Force free access 261 269 view
Long-Term Bonding Efficacy of CAD/CAM Hybrid Restorative Materials and Universal Adhesives
10.1922/EJPRD_2455Bashary07
no access 270 276 £
Clinical Performance of Short Fibre-reinforced Glass Ionomer Cement Restorations in Cervical Carious Lesions: 12-Month Randomized Clinical Trial
10.1922/EJPRD_2673AbdElAziz10
no access 277 286 £
Accuracy of Dental Implant Placement using Robotics. A Systematic Review of in vitro Studies
10.1922/EJPRD_2669Ravipati14
no access 287 300 £
Ability of Six Curing Lights to Photocure Four Resin-Based Composites in a MOD-Mold: A Double-Blind Study
10.1922/EJPRD_2661Comisi13
no access 301 313 £
Effect of Surface Treatment on Titanium Surface Free Energy and its Relation to Bacterial Activity: A Systematic Review
10.1922/EJPRD_2609Soares12
no access 314 325 £
Influence of Luminosity on the Precision and Accuracy of Intraoral Scanning: A Comparative in vitro Study
10.1922/EJPRD_2660Viana09
no access 326 334 £
Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Dentin Bond Strength and Interfacial Micromorphology of Three Universal Adhesives
10.1922/EJPRD_2706Fathy11
no access 335 345 £
An Assessment of 1067 Light Curing Units Measured Twice Between 2015 and 2021
10.1922/EJPRD_2693Price10
no access 346 355 £
Prosthetic Maintenance Assessment for Two Implant- Retained Overdentures Reinforced with PEKK Versus Co-Cr Framework: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
no access 356 364 £
  • free access Free Access
  • no access No Access
  • full access Full Access

Subscriptions