European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry

Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?

Abstract

Objectives: Reports concerning the accuracy of intraoral digital impression systems are limited. This study aimed to assess the effects of scan body types and shapes on digital impression accuracy and scanning time in all-on-four restorations. Methods: This in vitro study was conducted with two acrylic maxillary models. Two implant systems with different connection types (internal trilobe and external hexagon connection) were inserted according to the all-on-four design. Scanning was performed using Doowon, NT-Trading, and DESS scan bodies. Changes in implants’ positions (∆R) and angulation (∆A), and the implants’ distance from the reference pin (∆D) compared with the actual model were determined. Scanning times were also measured and compared. Results: The effects of implant connections and scan bodies on ∆R and ∆A were significant (p<0.05). Implant angulation could also affect ∆A (p=0.019). ∆D was only affected by scan body (p <0.001). The three scan bodies were significantly different in terms of scanning time (p=0.001). Conclusion: The results showed that scan body type and shape, and implant connection and angulation could affect digital impression accuracy in all-on-four restorations. For both internal and external connections, the NT-Trading and DESS scan bodies had the shortest and longest scanning times, respectively.

Keywords
Dental Implants
Dental Impression Technique
Dental Models

Authors

Dr. Maryam Moslemion, Dr. Leila Payaminia, Dr. Hamid Jalali, Prof. Marzieh Alikhasi

Articles from this issue

Title / DOI Access Page Start Page End Purchase
Bisphenol A in Dentistry
10.1922/EJPRD_01950Kechagias07
no access 3 9 £10.00
Digital Image Correlation and Finite Element Analysis of Bone Strain Generated by Implant-Retained Cantilever Fixed Prosthesis
10.1922/EJPRD_1941Tribst08
no access 10 17 £10.00
Do Type and Shape of Scan Bodies Affect Accuracy and Time of Digital Implant Impressions?
10.1922/EJPRD_1962Moslemion10
no access 18 27 £10.00
Two-body Wear and Hardness of New Generation Artificial Resin Teeth
10.1922/EJPRD_1958kayacioglu08
no access 28 35 £10.00
Clinical Evaluation of Chairside-Fabricated Partial Crowns Made of Zirconia Reinforced Lithium Silicate Ceramic - 2-Year-Results
10.1922/EJPRD_2001Rinke07
no access 36 42 £10.00
Factors Affecting DecisionMaking For Congenitally Missing Permanent Maxillary Lateral Incisors: A Retrospective Study
10.1922/EJPRD_1959Kafantaris10
no access 43 52 £10.00
  • free access Free Access
  • no access No Access
  • full access Full Access

Subscriptions